Reference

How much does a quality of earnings report cost?

The variables that set a QoE fee, how provider models differ, and how to scope the engagement without losing the findings that move price.

Written by CA Pranay Bhansali, Founder & Principal, Volaxi — Chartered Accountant (ICAI), former senior buy-side research analyst.

Last reviewed September 2026 · LinkedIn

The short answer

There is no responsible single market price for a quality of earnings report. The fee is set by the number of entities, ledger quality, periods covered, workstreams included, timetable and whether standalone financials need to be reconstructed. Volaxi quotes a fixed scope in writing after reviewing those facts.

Anyone quoting a single number without asking about entity count, ledger quality and scope is quoting a template, not your deal. Volaxi does not publish an unsupported market range as though it were a price list.

How each provider model works

Quality of earnings pricing by provider type
ProviderDelivery modelWhat you are buying
National / big-four transaction servicesInstitutional team and standard reporting processFull scope, brand comfort for lenders and investment committees, standardised report template. Staffed by whoever the firm assigns. Slowest to scope, least negotiable.
Regional CPA or advisory firmLocal partner oversight with an assigned delivery teamOften chosen where the buyer wants local professional-firm oversight and a report format familiar to lenders or an investment committee.
Boutique / independent QoE specialistExperienced practitioner with a tailored scopeNarrower scope, faster, often a single experienced practitioner. Works when the buyer is sophisticated enough to direct the scope themselves.
Offshore-supported build, signed locallyDefined workstream, quoted per deal or block of hoursCA Pranay Bhansali performs the databook, EBITDA bridge, working capital and net debt schedules directly. Your firm or a licensed firm you appoint reviews and signs where a signed opinion is required.

What actually sets the fee

  • Revenue and entity count

    A single-entity business is a different exercise from a multi-entity roll-up with intercompany trading and no consolidation.

  • Ledger quality

    Cash-basis books, no monthly close, or a chart of accounts that changed mid-period is the single biggest fee driver. Clean monthly management accounts can cut the hours materially.

  • Periods in scope

    Three years plus a trailing twelve months costs more than a TTM-only review. Many buyers do not need all three.

  • Scope breadth

    Earnings only, versus earnings plus net debt, working capital, cash proof and a forecast review. Each workstream is separately priceable.

  • Deal side

    Sell-side preparation is usually cheaper than buy-side, because the seller controls the data and there is no adversarial question loop.

  • Timetable

    A two-week turnaround against an exclusivity deadline is priced above a five-week one. Rush is a real cost, not a markup.

  • Carve-out or standalone

    If the target has never existed as a standalone entity, someone has to construct its financials before anyone can test them.

How to pay less without buying less

  • Scope to TTM plus one prior year

    Three full years matters for a cyclical or acquisitive business. For a stable services company, it often buys nothing a buyer will act on.

  • Do the close before the diligence

    Reconciled monthly accounts, an agreed chart of accounts and a clean trial balance remove the most expensive hours in any QoE.

  • Buy the analysis, not the brand

    If the report is for your own investment committee rather than a lender covenant, you may not need a national firm's letterhead.

  • Split the workstreams

    Commission earnings quality now; add net debt and working capital once the deal survives the first round of price discussion.

  • Use the offshore cost base

    The build is labour. Where the analyst sits changes what that labour costs — not, if the analyst is qualified, what the schedules say.

When a full QoE is not worth the fee

Said plainly, because a firm that only ever recommends its own service is not advising you.

  • Small transactions where a focused review of bank statements, tax returns and the payroll register answers the decision question proportionately.
  • Asset purchases where the earnings history does not transfer with the assets.
  • Situations where the seller will not give ledger-level access. A QoE built on summary management accounts is an expensive opinion, not evidence.

Questions buyers ask

How much does a quality of earnings report cost?
There is no responsible single market price for a quality of earnings report. The fee is set by the number of entities, ledger quality, periods covered, workstreams included, timetable and whether standalone financials need to be reconstructed. Volaxi quotes a fixed scope in writing after reviewing those facts.
Is a quality of earnings report cheaper than an audit?
Usually yes, and it answers a different question. An audit tests whether historical statements are fairly presented under an accounting framework. A QoE tests whether the earnings a buyer is pricing are sustainable and cash-convertible. Buyers pay for the second one because it is the one that moves price.
Who pays for the QoE report?
On buy-side diligence, the buyer. On sell-side preparation, the seller, usually as part of getting the business ready for market. Cost is occasionally shared or credited against the fee of a subsequent engagement, but that is a negotiation, not a convention.
Can the work be done offshore to reduce the fee?
The analytical build can, and widely is. Volaxi prepares the earnings-quality analysis, working capital and net debt schedules and the supporting databook from Bengaluru, delivered overnight into a US or UK working day. Where a signed report is required under a US or UK professional standard, the issuing firm signs it. Volaxi is not a US CPA firm or a UK statutory auditor and does not present itself as one.
How long does a quality of earnings report take?
Two to four weeks is typical for a lower mid-market deal with reasonable ledger access. The variable is not analyst speed — it is how quickly the target answers questions and how much reconstruction the books need before testing can start.
What should the fee include?
A written scope before work starts, a reported-to-adjusted EBITDA bridge with every adjustment sourced and graded by defensibility, net debt and working capital schedules if in scope, a linked Excel databook, and a findings note. If a quote does not name the deliverables, it is not a quote.

Discuss an Engagement

If you require support with financial modelling, business valuation or financial due diligence for a live transaction or strategic engagement, we'd be pleased to discuss your requirements.

Discuss an Engagement